Feedback

This is a drawing from my lecturer and this shows many different layout used by other newspapers that are similar to my product and the reason why she has done this is because I was having trouble with the layout for my website and so if I knew what other newspapers looked like I could make a knowledgable decision about how I should change my layout for it to look like a professional newpapers.

This is a feedback form from my lecturer for the second page of my main task, she lists all of the strengths of this page for example: appropriateness for task and audience and the overall design is very conventional however the lower an area of improvement would be the lower section, add the twitter/email adress.

This second assessment is for my poster as you can see from the checklist criteria she thinks that my work is in the low Level 4 criteria, around 8 points.

I have also recieved verbal feedback: widen the spaces for the articles on the front cover, make columns all the same width, change the advert arrangement so that the layout works better and move the sub-title to beneath the main title. All of these comments have been taken on board and have been chnaged so that the newspaper is best it can be. As well as the lecturers feedback I have also tried to evaluate and analyse my own work to make my work look better and so after these changes had been implemented I decided that my product still wasn't up to stratch and so decided to re-do my product, keep the content however move it around so that the layout fitted better.